Roy Lichtenstein created many
striking works of art, one of which was titled Girl created
in 1963. This piece was created by using a lithograph on white paper. Lichtenstein
used a style that is similar to comic strips and subject matter that reflected
pop culture. Lichtenstein was an avant-garde artist who stepped out of the box.
Lichtenstein’s use of comic book
style helps express his feelings toward early 20th century culture.
The Girl utilizes bright primary
colors; shades of blue, red and yellow. Then he uses dark bold lines and Benday
dots that together form rich tones, and an interesting texture. Even though
Lichtenstein takes his inspiration from advertisements and comics created near
the same time, he changes the image to focus on his message about pop culture,
though his messages are not always obvious. The lithograph Girl seems to be emphasizing something that is not captured in the
artwork itself. I say this because; she is pushed to the right of the piece creating
an asymmetrical balance with the bright blue on the left. Her face is tilted to
the side, with her bight blue eyes focused on something in the same direction. The
girl’s hands even appear to be pointing off the page. The way that the girl’s
mouth was depicted seems that maybe she was in the middle of a conversation,
the piece almost seems to be lacking a speak bubble. Lichtenstein was said to
have used a rotating easel in order to create art that was enthralling from all
angles.
Roy Lichtenstein’s collection of art
work is very different from abstract expressionism which was popular during the
same time he was creating his art. Instead his work captures a different essence,
Lichtenstein said his work is ''anti-contemplative, anti-nuance,
anti-getting-away-from-the-tyranny-of-the-rectangle, anti-movement and
anti-light, anti-mystery, anti-paint-quality, anti-Zen, and anti- all of those
brilliant ideas of preceding movements which everyone understands so thoroughly.”
In a way Lichtenstein is forcing viewers to stare in the eye of their pop
culture, in the process of doing so his work could be considered avant-garde.
For an artist to be considered
avant-garde they must be politically radical and/or technically radical. To be
politically radical one must reference the current world and try to help move
forward. I would say that Lichtenstein is politically radical because he used
commercial advertisement in a way that showcases his thoughts and feelings
about popular culture. He is even more political when he uses war imagery like
his painting Torpedo…LOS!, which could be referencing use of nuclear weapons in warfare. Though his art does not suggest a particular way to fix or
move forward with the current issues, it should still be considered politically
radical and avant-garde. To be considered technically radical an artist must be
able to create art that is different from work that is being made at the same
time. I think that his work is extremely technically radical. He utilizes Benday
dots that were at the time reserved for art in comics and in art created mechanically.
Lichtenstein’s art mainly uses primary colors that create an overall artificial
look which is very different from most work produce before his time.
Lichtenstein was an avant-garde artist who was noticed for his bright interesting
art that was focused on popular culture.
Resources:
That quote about Lichtenstein's art being "anti-contemplative [and] anti-nuanced" is great. This is a great way to contrast pop art with Abstract Expressionism. Lichtenstein wasn't going for expressive art that might have philosophical or mysterious qualities. He just wanted to embrace the superficiality of pop culture.
ReplyDelete-Prof. Bowen
I really enjoyed your explanation on the breakdown of the composition of this popular piece. It is a great new twist from the abstract that was considered popular before this time, I guess that's what makes Lichtenstein avant-garde. Good work.
ReplyDeleteThe quote you used was very intriguing because it let me dive into Lichtenstein's brain a little bit. Describing the picture you presented and critiquing what it is so different looking was interesting to read about. Also, I never really noticed how Lichtenstein used primary colors in order to compose his image.
ReplyDelete