Naturalism is a key part of Renaissance art during the 15th century. Naturalism is capturing objects as it appears in nature. Artists would strive for extreme detail and idealized perfection while attaining balance and harmony. Renaissance artists were influenced by humanism, the appreciation of human achievement. Baroque art of the 17th century integrates some ideals from the Renaissance while moving forward with change. Michelangelo created David in 1501-1504 this sculpture embodies Renaissance ideals. Bernini created a David sculpture in 1623, comparing the two David sculptures shows how Baroque art has evolved from Renaissance art.
Michelangelo’s David conveys Renaissance styles; naturalism, idealism, humanism and harmony. This David sculpture is naturalistic yet idealized because he has anatomy, and very perfect musculature. David appears to be perfectly proportionate except his hands that are huge. It is said that his hands are large because David was going to be placed very high. From far away David’s hands would have appeared proportionate. His hair is idealized with flawless curls. Harmony is captured by creating him to be the perfect height, and by utilizing contrapposto pose. The contrapposto pose is when the figure has one weight bearing leg and one bent leg, which causes a shift in the hips. There is added balance in the arms, one arm is bent and the other is straight, similar to his legs. Humanism is achieved in this sculpture through appreciation of the nude human body.
Art during the 17th century has many stylistic similarities to Renaissance art yet is very different. Baroque art rejects Renaissance ideals of perfection through idealism. Baroque art is visually dynamic, includes emotion and drama. This art period conveys true naturalism by showing even the dirt under fingernails. I think that it is interesting to compare the David sculptures by Michelangelo and Bernini. Comparing sculptures like this demonstrate the evolution of art from Renaissance to Baroque.
I think you are right that Baroque art is "messier" than Renaissance art. I do think, though, that Bernini is interested in idealism (at least to a degree). The muscles on his sculpture still seem pretty defined to me.
ReplyDelete-Prof. Bowen
I do enjoy looking at Berenini's sculpture more because it does seem more real like he was actually fighting and dirty cause it was a hard battle compared to Michelangelo's David who is to ideal, to me it doesnt even look like he picked up a finger. I really liked your post.
ReplyDeleteJennifer Groce
Your description of Bernini’s David being more naturalistic because of his anatomy seems interesting to me. It does seem to be more natural that Michelangelo chose for his David. I feel like if Michelangelo had intended to only sculpt David rather than the larger project planned he would have chosen a better pose for David to be placed in. Overall I enjoy the Baroque period more because they do incorporate more drama and emotion into their pieces like you said.
ReplyDeleteGood article... May I share an article about Florence from Piazza Michelangelo in http://stenote.blogspot.com/2018/01/florence-view-from-piazzale-michelangelo.html
ReplyDeleteWatch the video in youtube https://youtu.be/pg1apQjPrkY